Roman Cities
The Roman idea of a city is civilisation; the civilised
person (cives, plural civites) lives in a city (civitas), a constructed place for a
human to live in. Aristotle said that those who live outside the city are gods
or monsters; Romulus allegedly offered his followers a deal: follow my laws and
you will be protected by me and free of all previous obligations.
We think we know what a Roman city looks like: a grid of
streets, with the cardo and decumanus crossing at the place where the temple
and law court denote a central square. By that token, the one city which fails
that is, of course Rome. It had grown up long before the idea of planning a
town had reached Italy and around several cores.
Three groups, two of them incomers, had settled on the seven
hills above the marsh. The incomers were the Rhames, a bunch of runaways and
malcontents led by a small core group of young men who’d recently left the
village of Alba Longa to prevent overpopulation; the second group was a
contingent of Sabines looking to populate the coastal region. They both kept
themselves to themselves away from those who’d settled there, the so-called ‘aborigines’. Where they had to work in
common, the three groups voted by threes, tribus;
that ablative plural became a noun, giving us ‘tribe’.
As Andrew Wallace-Hadrill has recently pointed out, few
Romans lived in villas or even town houses which presented a blank face to the
street, but which surrounded a beautiful atrium in the centre. The vast
majority lived in an insula, a
multi-storey block of flats, often hundreds of years old. There would be shops
on the ground floor, including cook shops for those who had no ability to cook
for themselves. The poor maintenance led to innumerable court cases and to
several spectacular collapses. Don’t think of a modern western block, but more
of the jerry-built blocks still being out up in places like Bangladesh and
Nepal with poor building standards and backhanders to officials to turn a blind
eye. Fourth century estimates cite up to 46,000 insulae and only 1790 houses. This must mean that, even though the
city of Rome had a declining population, everyone who was not a senator or
senior member of the imperial or city bureaucracy must have lived in one.
Remains of insulae from Ostia Antica, second century AD
Pliny the Younger brought a case to the attention of Trajan
in Book 10 of his collected letters: the city of Nikapolis in Bithynia-Pontus
had erected an arena as a showpiece for the city, hoping to raise its status in
Asia Minor. But they had built it without foundations and it soon collapsed,
prompting Pliny to ask Trajan to endorse an official investigation as to how
this had happened.
The truth about the layout of cities and towns in the Roman
era is that the central concept of a regular planned urban space was perhaps an
ideal, but many cities already existed and had to be accommodated.
Nevertheless, the ideal was that the city you were born in was your
citizenship: they used the same word: civitas.
We might call this a city-district, since it comprised an urban core in which a
number of higher-function activities took place (justice, religion, politics)
along with different types of industrial activity. Dirty and noxious industry
was often moved to the outskirts, downstream from the places where people drew
water to drink, cook and clean themselves and their clothes, and ideally down
the prevailing wind from the city is foul-smelling (rendering animal fats and
fulling cloth being good examples).
People who lived in dependent communities outside the city
would come there in the spring to bring animals to sell, and again in early
autumn with grain. The political control of the city would extended to their
journey inbound and going home, with the laws and gods invoked to depend the
honesty of the market. Mis-selling goods and short measure were forbidden and
the safety of all was protected. While in the city, the area’s farmers would
look for any additional farmhands in a hiring fair, hear the latest news and
gossip, eye up potential spouses for their children, ask the elders to settle
any local disputes and perform for the gods what they had promised in the event
of good fortune.
Such things have happened in many sorts of cities all over
the world from the earliest days and still do. Rome’s rising cities fulfilled
the traditional function.
When Augustus rebuilt Rome and other cities, he filled in
the democratic spaces some had made use of. At Rome, he built a memorialised
quarter over the Field of Mars; the Campus Martius had been the mustering place
for the citizen army each spring; many places had a March field. It was also
the area where citizens went to vote, through stalls like those used for some
horse races. Now Rome’s wars were elsewhere, the legions stationed for hundreds
of years in provicial cities, and democracy was dead. So how better to
obliterate that apace than by building over it.
In Athens, the historic agora,
where citizens had voted, was filled up with temples transferred their from
across Greece. The democratic space in Athens was killed, as in Rome, by
religion.
Around each city was a dead zone. It was considered unhygienic
in a hot climate to bury the dead within the urban area; the idea of burying
the dead near a sacred place only arrives with Christianity, so the burial of
early Christians are the Vatican (Mons Vaticanus) is possible because it was
‘trans Tiber’; to this day the area is called ‘Trastevere’; curiously, this was
a place where vates, Gaulish priests,
performed their rituals. Circling the zones of the living and dead at Rome was
a sacred belt, the pomerium, where
religious and legal restrictions were enforced. These included forbidding the
use of arms within the urbs under
Augustus’s’s law (lex julia de vi privata).
Rome was divided into a number of districts, each named for
a notable feature such as a monumental fountain, a particular temple or a
theatre. Modern cities often do this (Charing Cross, Unter den Linden, Temple
Bar, Opéra, Tivoli Gardens, etc.). We
also know that different districts had different status levels; the Subura at
Rome is described as a red light district, a working class district (not that
Romans had class structures as we would understand the term)
Surviving structures
from Rome’s Subura district
However, areas then as now changed over time and it should
be noted that Julius Caesar was born in a house in this district. The district
lies in a dip between the Viminal and Esquiline Hills at the north side of the
city. Then as now, the higher the altitude, the higher the status; the imperial
palace was on top of Palatine, one of Rome’s seven hills; the Italian royal
palace was atop the Quirinal Hill; today the Italian President lives there.
Walls set boundaries and were obviously available for
defence. Rome’s original wall dates back only to the fourth century BC, but was
credited to Servius Tullius, Rome’s penultimate king. Clearly, this wall, which
survives in places, was not extant when the Gauls seized Rome in c380BC, so the
name may have been traditional, or maybe the plans for it were approved by
Servius but it was never built.
A section of the
Servian Wall, near to Rome’s railway station
The much larger Aurelian Wall, the one which survives today,
is built completely outside the Servian Wall, and encloses an area some three
times as large. This was built c270–5 for utterly changed political
circumstances. Before that, the outer parts of the city must have been entirely
extramural.
Aurelian Wall section near
Via Veneto
The wall was improved by Maxentius by improvements to forts and again by Stilicho in AD401. This shows that it was in fine condition when Alaric’s Gothic Army turned up in AD410 and that they must have been invited in, as they could hardly have broken through.
It is well known that eventually Constantinople developed a
triple ring of walls, which is why it survived till AD1453, when the cannon of
Sultan Mehmet II, known as The Prophet and built for him by the Venetians, blew
a hole in it.
However, walls could be decorative, and as such might be
part of civic eurgetism by social competing citizens. Those of Le Mans in
France (Cenomanum) are particularly pretty, with at least four rows of
contrasting designs.
The third century AD
walls of Le Mans, Maine, France
These are walls designed for display more than four defence.
By contrast, the walls of Arverna (modern Clermont-Ferrand) were ruinous in the
fifth century when they needed to be strong; they fell down through great age
and the city’s bishop, the celebrated letter writer Sidonius Apollinaris,
conducted Christian rogations, beating the bounds of the city in a hope that
magical thinking would stop the forces of King Euric from seizing it.
Le Vasso Galate, a surviving
section of the imperial city wall of Arverna (Clermont-Ferrand)
It the later parts of the empire, cities everywhere shrank
and became less multi-functional.
It would be useful to consider the link between cities and
early Christianity. In every town where there was a Roman presence, there was a
priest; in every city with a governor, a bishop; in cities which were seats of vicarii, there was a metropolitan, what
we’d call an archbishop. In imperial capitals and cities of high standing,
there were senior metropolitans with overarching authority; some were termed
patriarchs, great fathers, a term used civicly for men of high authority just
below the emperor: Stilicho, Aetius and Theodoric held such a title. Thus it
can be seen that the Christians shadowed the urban authority of the empire.
Once legal, the network of clergy stepped forward. Constantine allowed bishops
to run their own law courts in parallel with the civic ones. In the late
empire, towns generally survived if the bishop stayed; if he left, the city was
eventually abandoned, such was his network of patronage. There were no rural
clergy at that time, so Christianity was professed as an urban religion and
those who had no priest to instruct them were termed pagani – country people.
We discussed before the straight Roman streets of many
cities; these remained while there was a city authority of decurions to
prosecute anyone who impinged his shop or house onto the public highway. In the
earlier empire and before, local nobles had wanted to be on the city council.
Latterly, however, they had to be compelled. The praetorian prefect and
governor set the tax expectations of the emperor as a precept and it was the job
of the decurions to collect it; they therefore were loaned the money by a tax
farmer, who then forced locals to pay, skimming off the surplus collected.
In the countryside taxes were harder to collect and there
were no Christian clergy to demand a tithe and attendance at church. The fact
that being outside the walls with the gods and monsters and at risk of seizures
by brigands (Bacaudae) did not stop
removal from the city to a country retreat suggests that there was an impetus
to leave the city.
The fifth century comic play Querolus (the Complainer) refers to a man fed up with paying taxes
is offered a chance to join the ‘free men of the Loire’ who live under the
trees and pay no taxes. He refuses because he is civilised.
Research on the city of Antioch shows that the straight,
Romanised streets were becoming deviated in the 300s AD, centuries before the
Islamic conquest of Syria in the 630s. Shop owners had built out into the city
streets, possibly with shaded awnings, narrowing the road and making it
crooked.
In Britain, there was a forced removal of skilled artisans
after the regime of Carausius and Allectus was defeated. A Latin panegyric poem
to Constantius Chlorus from the people of Autun (Augustodunum) in Gaul refers
to such people being transported to repair Autun because they were so numerous
in Britain. It should be recalled that by the time of St Wilfrid the
Anglo-Saxons had to import glass-makers from the kingdom of the Franks because
nobody in Britain knew how to make glass. Archaeologists tell us that for a
while watermills, a common sight in the Roman world ceased to exist in Britain.
There are curious burials associated with urban buildings at
Wroxeter, Shropshire (Viroconium), where high-status buildings were turned into
forges and city houses were partly demolished to be turned into cattle pens.
However, a change in function need not be read as a social collapse; today we
find people living in oast houses, old windmills, maltings, converted stables
and barns, even old factories and warehouses, as in the US, and we don’t
consider any of that to be a sign of social collapse; if anything some may
think it cool.
Climate change in Britain may have exacerbated many other
problems. We read in Gildas about severe famines, which would have hastened
departures from cities. A typical small town like Ixworth, Suffolk (Sitomagus)
may have suffered from earthquakes; in the 19th century the town
underwent severe quakes, and people may
have left the Roman town of Sitomagus for similar reasons. It is quite
clear across Britain that there were no resources to repair dilapidated
buildings, that urban life with its high taxes, controlled labour, nosy clergy
and the possibility of being transported to Gaul on a whim would not have been
attractive to building workers. The rise of rural villa life in Britain in the
fourth century, something that is well attested, may have been a way for pagans
and discontented people to supply skilled labour to others who had opted out of
the Roman system.
In some places, cities retreated back into their cores, with
a barrier built across exit roads. Populations shrank away, but as long as the
priest stayed there and the ruler at least went there to administer ritual and
justice, the community might survive. The Anglo
Saxon Chronicle records kings with British names losing the Battle of
Dyrham in AD577; their kingdoms were the towns of Gloucester, Cirencester and
Bath, which suggests highly local rule, based solely on a town.
No comments:
Post a Comment